Codrul Cosminului
Department of Human, Social and Political Sciences, 2019
Paper title:
|
Confessional Groups in the Republic of Tatarstan: Identity and Features of its Design
|
DOI:
|
https://doi.org/10.4316/CC.2019.01.005
|
Published in:
|
Issue 1, (Vol. 25) / 2019
|
Publishing date:
|
2019-07-31
|
Pages:
|
87-94
|
Author(s):
|
Titova Tatyana, Frolova Elena, Gushchina Elena, Blagoveshchenskaya Anastasia
|
Abstract:
|
The relevance of the problem is determined by the need for a comprehensive study of interfaith group viewpoints in multi-ethnic and multi-confessional regions of the Russian Federation. The purpose of this article is to analyze the strategies of designing the identity in the environment of religious groups in the Republic of Tatarstan in 2017 - 2018. The leading approach to the study of this problem is based on the multi-paradigmatic methodology. The article gives a comparative description of ideological attitudes of the three groups studied - Muslims, Orthodox Christians, and atheists. Special attention is paid to the analysis of mechanisms of religious socialization and transmission of religious values. It is concluded that Muslims attach greater importance to the performance of religious rites and practices; they consider a family as the main agent of religious socialization and support the opinion that "people do not choose their religion".
|
Keywords:
|
Confessionality, Tatarstan, identity, religious socialization, rites and rituals, ethnicity.
|
References:
|
1. В. А. Тишков, Ю. П. Шабаев, Этнополитология: Политические функции этничнос-ти. Учебник для вузов [Ethnopolitology: Political Functions of Ethnicity. University textbook], Москва, Издательство Московского университета, 2011, 376 c.
2. Л. М. Дробижева, С. В. Рыжова (ред.), Позитивные межнациональные отношения и предупреждение нетерпимости: опыт Татарстана в общероссийском контексте [Positive ethnic relations and the prevention of intolerance: the experience of Tatarstan in an all-Russian context], Санкт-Петербург: Нестор-История, 2016. 152 c.
3. Fredrik Barth, Analysis of Culture in Complex Societies, "Ethnos. Journal of Anthropo-logy", Vol. 54, 1989., No. 3-4, p. 120-142.
4. Л. М. Дробижева (ред.), Российская идентичность в Москве и регионах [Russian identity in Moscow and the regions], Москва, Институт социологии РАН; МАКС Пресс, 2009, 268 c.
5. В. А. Тишков, Реквием по этносу: исследования по социально-культурной ан-тропологии [Requiem for ethnos: research on socio-cultural anthropology], Москва, Наука, 2003, 544 c.
6. Р. Г. Абдулатипов, Этнополитология. Учебное пособие [Ethnopolitology. Study guide], Санкт-Петербург: Питер, 2004, 313 c.
7. Т. Г. Стефаненко, Этнопсихология [Ethnopsychology], Москва: Аспект-Пресс, 2003, 365 c.
8. A. N. Sabirova, T. A. Titova, E. V. Frolova, Collective social and cultural distance in the sphere of interethnic relations in the Republic of Tatarstan, "The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication", Vol. 6, 2016, November Special Edition, http://www.tojdac.org/tojdac/VOLUME6-NOVSPCL_files/tojdac_v060NVSE188.pdf
9. T. Titova, Ethnic Cultural and Religious Practices of Migrant Women in the Republic of Tatarstan, "Journal of Sustainable Development", Vol. 8, 2015, No. 4, p. 177-186.
10. T. Titova, Ethnic identity and ethno-cultural needs of the modern Russian rural popu-lation of Tatarstan (based on ethno-sociological research), "Man in India", Vol. 97, 2016, Issue 9, p. 1-7.
11. T. Titova, The host population and the migrants in modern Tatarstan: Social roles and intergroup distance, "Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict", vol. 20, 2016, Special Issue 2, p. 166-172.
|
